Who would Jesus sue?

15 Jan


If you are interested in Melinda Tankard Reist’s fundamentalist Christianity you’ll find a biography here with far more detail than I provided, including her affiliation with the Salt Shakers, a Christian fundamentalist organisation founded by, among others, strident anti-homosexual Baptist preacher Bill Meuhlenberg. Meuhlenberg’s latest anti same-sex marriage rant, titled “When darkness descends upon a nation” was written in reaction to the recent ALP decision to support same-sex marriage.

Among other rhetorical gems, you’ll find this comment on Prime Minister Julia Gillard:

And what of Labor’s leader? Did we really ever expect that a fornicating socialist atheist was going to really hold the line on this? Of course not; certainly not when she is in bed with our other leader, a homosexual socialist atheist.

What you will also discover in the Tankard Reist bio is that for 12 years she was employed by Tasmanian Senator Brian Harradine as his bio ethics advisor. During this period Harradine successfully prevented Australian women from accessing the drug RU 486 despite it being available in other Western countries, and the numerous trials that had proven it’s safety and effectiveness as an early abortion drug.

But wait! There’s more! During Tankard Reist’s employment as his bio ethics advisor, Harradine also successfully prevented AusAID,the main Australian government overseas aid organisation, from funding any organisations that provide “abortion training or services, or research, trials or activities which directly involve abortion drugs,” even where it could save the life of a woman.

The Harradine-determined AusAID policy allowed funding for counselling after an abortion, but disallowed the dissemination of advice and education to women in underdeveloped countries who sought safe abortion.

A World Bank Report at that time estimated some 68,000 women in underdeveloped countries died as a consequence of unsafe abortion, and some 5.3 million suffered temporary or permanent disability.

This situation caused Bernard Keane to write this in Crikey, in an article titled “AusAID conservatives have blood on their hands:”

As a consequence of the restrictions, thousands of women overseas have died from unsafe abortions (see Sue Dunlevy’s excellent article from last year for some figures). Those deaths are a direct legacy of Brian Harradine and the Howard Government’s willingness to cater to the medieval delusions of the superstitious.

Tankard Reist’s involvement with fundamentalist Christians opposed to abortion, contraception, surrogacy, and homosexuality are well documented, and I have to wonder why she’s singled me out at this point in time for writing about her religious beliefs.

Throughout her career, Tankard Reist has doggedly described herself as a feminist, despite her anti choice stand, and her willingness to align herself with people such as Meuhlenberg and Harradine, who seek to exert their control over women’s bodies. Tankard Reist appears to be quite comfortable supporting and abetting this urge to dominate and control women, while simultaneously railing against what she considers the objectification, sexualisation, and pornification of women in popular culture.

Tankard Reist apparently has no qualms about having worked for a man whose determination to impose his religious beliefs on government policy prevented women far less fortunately placed than herself  from accessing medical help and education about contraception and abortion. It appears to be of little consequence to her that women in underdeveloped countries suffered and died as a direct consequence of Harradine’s religious beliefs, during the period when he was her employer.

Yet show her a Kanye West video or a Brian McFadden clip, or women in Victoria’s Secret lingerie who like pole dancing, and she’s got petitions going every which way to silence and censor. What’s wrong with this picture?

As I think Jesus is reported as having observed, by their friends you shall know them.

(The title of this post comes from a tweet I received yesterday and I think it’s brilliant.)

UPDATE: I received the letter of demand from Tankard Reist’s lawyers on my personal email address. They state that they’ve sent a hard copy to my home address. I am not in the phone directory and I have no landline in my name. My personal email address isn’t available on my blog and neither is my home address. It probably wasn’t difficult to find someone who would divulge my email address, but my home address? 

Advertisements

47 Responses to “Who would Jesus sue?”

  1. skepticlawyer January 15, 2012 at 1:04 pm #

    I can’t speak on the email issue, but hard copy process servers generally obtain addresses from the Electoral Roll. Because voting is compulsory in Australia, this is very easy to do.

    Like

    • Jennifer Wilson January 15, 2012 at 1:06 pm #

      Ah, yes, forgot the electoral roll. Thanks.

      Like

      • gerard oosterman January 15, 2012 at 7:07 pm #

        And driver’s license!

        I thought that mediation is compulsory but exemptions can be applied for with a Non-Filing of Dispute Resolution Certificate. skepticlawyer would know all about it.

        Like

  2. clyde1120 January 15, 2012 at 1:40 pm #

    Don’t worry too much Jennifer. MTR has just picked you randomly I think because she isn’t getting her way. You can count on me and I hope many others to chip in to fight this oppressive smothering of public debate that I would argue is utterly necessary in a healthy democracy…well, as close as we get to one anyway!

    Like

    • Jennifer Wilson January 15, 2012 at 2:35 pm #

      Thank you, Clyde. It is an attempt to smother public debate on a topic that affects everyone and that everyone has the right to speak about.

      Like

  3. Catherine Manning January 15, 2012 at 1:46 pm #

    You’re certainly not alone Jennifer. I too have been threatened by MTR with legal action, along with receiving threatening and abusive (bullying) emails, from one of her ‘lap dogs’ for telling my truth about my experience of her through a couple of my campaigns. Her wrath laid upon me was due to my association with Leslie Cannold during my Pull the Pin (on beauty pageants for children) campaign. Little did I know that that would be like waving a red rag to a bull. However, instead of calling and speaking with me directly, she contacted personal friends of mine AND MY EMPLOYER in an attempt to undermine me, and I was tossed from her fold faster than I could say ‘Jesus!’. She was most upset with me for sharing an article Leslie wrote calling some child beauty pageant objectors ‘religious psuedo-feminists’, and insisted that I must have known Leslie was referring to her (I didn’t know – or care).
    @Tiga Bu – despite my best efforts and offers to respectfully resolve this with her, mediation was never an option for her. She has since been dogged in her crusade against me, creating a ‘war’ where there wasn’t one and asking some mutual friends whose ‘mast they pin their flag to’.

    I haven’t experienced anything like this since high school – in fact, not even then! It’s very disturbing that this is coming from someone who is speaking out using a supposedly feminist platform. Bullying and attempting to silence others is anti-feminist in my opinion, and all of this takes away from what the real issues are.

    Her threatening email to me said not to reply to her directly but through her lawyers – but she didn’t leave their contact details, and I still haven’t heard boo from them. I wish they’d call ‘coz I have shitloads of emails and messages they’d love. Truth is the best defence to defamation.

    Like

  4. Jennifer Wilson January 15, 2012 at 5:48 pm #

    He did. I believe Amanda Vanstone was behind that repatriation. Doesn’t matter, whoever was in govt would have done the same to placate the Chinese govt.

    Like

  5. Marilyn January 15, 2012 at 5:52 pm #

    Sure would have, we are still sending people home in shackles to be slaughtered.

    Like

  6. paul walter January 15, 2012 at 7:20 pm #

    That was right between the eyes; spirited. As Marilyn commented, referring perhaps to Jennifer’s point about numerous deaths through backyard abortion in her comments about asylum seekers, a lot of people actually suffer through the denial of relevant information. Expanding, you can contemplate ethnic purges also, as a consequence of the ignorance induced by censorship practices as well as contempt for the suffering of the masses of “undeserving” third world poor.

    Like

  7. paul walter January 15, 2012 at 10:42 pm #

    Yes, it hits me, that last para. That is very “nazi” to me.

    Like

  8. Rorschach January 16, 2012 at 12:37 am #

    You might want to contact Popehat for some legal advice. Oh, and I’ve written a little post about this myself. Cheers.

    Like

  9. Horse January 16, 2012 at 7:31 am #

    Is it possible that MTR doesn’t want her Christianity or past-Christianity to get in the way of her anti-child-sexualisation or anti-porn campaigning ie. she want those campaigns to not be side-tracked by “less relevant” issues?

    Like

    • Jennifer Wilson January 16, 2012 at 9:29 am #

      I think that is how MTR would argue her position. But not everyone feels the Christianity is irrelevant I guess.

      Like

      • Horse January 16, 2012 at 10:45 am #

        Where she comes from is relevant, unless the arguments she puts up are good ones. The arguments seem to be good wrt child sexualisation (and her Christianity seems less relevant), but not wrt generalisations about most men and pornography, especially the view pornography is some widespread conspiracy (I am not, however, for promoting porn).

        Looking at her website, and some interviews & media appearances, MTR seems as much about self promotion as she is about any issues.

        Like

  10. James Jenkin January 17, 2012 at 7:50 am #

    Go Jennifer! You’re an inspiration!

    Like

  11. Anonymous January 17, 2012 at 8:20 am #

    Sadly she sees you as a source of money as well as something to smother and stifle. Fundies are so righteous they do not believe in anyone having any other opinion. If you don’t share her views, you need to either die or STFU. She’s got lots of money behind her to piss away on lawyers and barristers in order to try to intimidate you. She will demand you pay her $50K to drop it. It’s legalised extortion. I’ve been there. Hopefully the Streisand Effect will pay off for you and lots of people in the legal biz rise up to help. See if you can get pro bono help, I had to because I couldn’t afford to fight the fundy loon who went after me. Good luck and promote this everywhere and anywhere. Make it backfire on her.

    Like

  12. Concerned teacher and Fitzroy resident January 17, 2012 at 8:59 am #

    The Salt Shakers are a cult who target the youth (especially new migrant youth from the Horn of Africa and Asia) from the housing commission flats in Richmond and Fitzroy. Every Sunday they offer ‘dance parties’ and funky wrist bands to these often very isolated and lonely youth seeking somewhere to belong in their new home. They use veiled language to entice vulnerable youth, promising fantasy kingdoms of domestic marital happiness, whilst rattling the hat for donations.
    Beware well dressed woman promising the unobtainable.

    Like

  13. Moz January 17, 2012 at 10:28 am #

    I don’t know all the facts but it seems to me, as a barrister practising in this area, that, assuming what you wrote was even defamatory(?), you may have a number of defences to a defamation suit by this woman, including truth (perhaps contextual truth depending on her imputations), fair comment, honest opinion and qualified privilege – including the constitutional ‘free speech’ on government and political matters recognised in Lange v ABC – subject to malice and acting reasonably. All the material on abortion and backgroud on Harradine etc is likely grist for that mill.
    Any case she brings would involve descending into her background and beliefs in great detail and no doubt generating a lot of publicity…

    Like

    • Jennifer Wilson January 17, 2012 at 1:49 pm #

      It’s good to hear what you think as a legal professional, and it’s pretty much what a lot of others have commented. Seems like a strange act to have started all this. She only had to send me a post refuting my claims and I would have put it up. Saved her a lot of embarrassment and money.

      Like

  14. Stuart Skene January 17, 2012 at 10:43 am #

    You have my support re: Tankard Reist attempt to sue. Good luck to her proving you weren’t accurate in your account.

    Like

  15. Arnica January 17, 2012 at 11:22 am #

    I hadn’t heard of your blog until I read about the potential law suit on SMH. I’m grateful to MTR for directing me here, a very good read!

    Like

    • Jennifer Wilson January 17, 2012 at 1:42 pm #

      Welcome! I guess everything has an up side even being threatened with defamation!

      Like

  16. Mira January 17, 2012 at 11:35 am #

    Jennifer, you are my new hero!! i read the smh piece today and thought the only way MTR could pursue a defamation suit against you is if she argued fundamentalist Christians were abhorrent and her reputation has been negatively affected by being associated with them. Oh and if you have truth on your side, thats a decider right there. More power to you, we need more people to carry on the Hitchens fight of asking the hard questions and expecting answers, especially to those who seek to affect our rights and tell us how to live our lives. MTR’s lawyer will know she has no chance but they also know people who are threatened don’t want to test it in court so they bluff it by coming down hard with threats, and pretending they are entirely confident in their case. Its a well known tactic.

    Like

    • Jennifer Wilson January 17, 2012 at 1:42 pm #

      I know, I agree with your summary of the situation. I can’t be totally sure it won’t go further though, so I need to cover myself.

      Like

  17. Marilyn January 17, 2012 at 4:18 pm #

    Funny though how the media didn’t think it was outrageous that the fundamentalist jewish lobby should be allowed to try and stop the release of DVD’s of the excellent serial “The Promise” which has been seen all over the world already.

    To claim it shows jews as nazis is right, but then jews are behaving like nazis – doing to the Palestinians what the nazis did to the jews and they have been for over 60 years.

    The Promise was brilliant honest and made mostly by jews.

    Their whining should guarantee many sales.

    Like

  18. eeenok January 17, 2012 at 4:30 pm #

    i think an important point is that, regardless of her literal religious beliefs, MTR is pushing the agenda and doctrines of fundamentalist christianity, disguised as reasonable argument. if you spend a decade or so (as i have) reading right wing christian literature, it is immediately apparent that much of MTR’s language and philosophical framework is directly inherited from avowedly fundamentalist christians (e.g. dobson’s Focus on the Family to name one of countless possible influences). if you attend one of these groups, you inevitably adopt their language (code) of “pro-family”, “pro-life”, “fornicating socialist atheists” destroying our “god-given rights” (etc. etc. etc.), otherwise you are incapable of having discussions within their particular framework whereby every position you share is obviously correct. personally, i can’t imagine anybody arguing with the stylistic content of MTR without being a faithful member of one of these groups

    Like

    • Love June 11, 2012 at 12:02 pm #

      Thanks for bringing the potitien to our attention, Rodney. I’ve signed it and advertised it on my Facebook page. Petitions do work, and so do letters and phone calls to our elected representatives; it generally only takes a little bit of noise for them to take the matter seriously.

      Like

  19. Ben January 17, 2012 at 5:25 pm #

    Good on you Jennifer – a very interesting read, and glad I’ve discovered your blog.

    Like

  20. simeon_trowbridge January 17, 2012 at 6:24 pm #

    Jen. You say that it appears to be of little consequence to MTR that women in underdeveloped countries suffered and died as a direct consequence of Harradine’s religious beliefs, and her lobbying efforts, during the period when he was her employer. I saw this post on another of your articles that demonstrates that MTR doesn’t care about the sanctity of life, nor the true welfare of children. She really is quite an odious person, focused only upon self aggrandizement.

    ————–

    I read with great interest the following passage between a Face Book member and Melinda Tankard Reist on her personal FB page. The exchange suggests to me that Ms Reist is far less interested in serious issues and immediate dangers to children from predators, say, as much as she is outraged by ‘sexist’ men’s magazines. It appears she likes publicity, more than reality.

    9 September ’11 at 18:40

    Richard Henderson –

    “Ms Reist. Mandatory internet filtering promises disaster for our children. Kids commonly use free proxies to circumvent school network blocks. Many of these are, in fact, “honeypots” used by unscrupulous free proxy operators to exploit kids’ email and social networking accounts. Some are fronts for pedophile networks and predators that set-up virtual servers to lure their prey. Instead of tightening the net on pedophiles, mandatory censorship will create millions of additional trapdoors where perverts patiently lay in wait for our kids. Is that avoidable, direct danger to our children an acceptable outcome of mandatory censorship which you clearly supported on ‘The Drum’? Why do eminent groups such as Save the Children, National Children’s Youth Law Center, The Australian Library & Information Association and Civil Liberties Australia all oppose mandatory internet censorship? The immutable fact is that if Labor censor the Internet, kids and teens WILL use these proxies, swapping them like we used to exchange bubblegum cards. ISP level filtering, meanwhile, will give parents a false sense of security, believing their children are actually limited from accessing age-inappropriate material. Not opposing this mandatory internet filtering legislation means that we – well-intentioned people – are literally helping to push them closer to danger. Finally, there are free opt-in ‘Net Nanny’ filters, one less since the Rudd/Gillard administration removed the government subsidised platform, why do we need mandatory ones? I hope you will acknowledge this on Q&A

    Melinda Tankard Reist –

    Thanks Richard. It is true motivated individuals will always be able to find their way to circumvent filters, however the purpose of the Governments policy to block RC content is to prevent inadvertent access to this harmful content so that the very many people who do not want to be exposed to it, won’t be. The Goverment’s (sic) policy is to only block RC content- child abuse material, sexual violence such as rape, bestiality, detailed promotion or instruction in crime or drug use and terrorism material. Just because some people break speeding laws doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have speed limits. The Government’s policy includes education, law eforcement (sic) and research recognising that there is no simple solution.

    Richard Henderson –

    Thank you for your reply, Ms Reist. The ‘motivated individuals’ you refer to are largely Internet savvy children and teens who can effortlessly circumvent any filter in existence over a matter of minutes. I am saddened that you chose not to address the grave issue of ‘honeypots’ … the fact that mandatory Internet filtering will likely bring our children into DIRECT contact with sexual predators. I don’t really understand your analogy that because some people break speeding laws doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have speed limits; I put it to you that society has a duty of care whereby we should not risk putting a predator into closer proximity with our children. Would you not be personally devastated to find that a child had been abducted or sexually exploited as a result of their email or FaceBook account being hacked due to phishing schemes – scams made infinitely easier courtesy of mandatory filtering and ‘honeypots’? Clearly, you would. As I mentioned in my earlier post, ISP level filtering will give parents a false sense of security, believing their children are actually limited from accessing age-inappropriate material. Again, this false belief that the Net is safe, or safer even, will actually result in marked reductions in parental supervision. There is a raft of far better ways to counter child exploitation, many of which actually lead to convictions of the perpetrators. I agree that there is no simple solution; however, mandatory filtering plays no part in any solution when it INCREASES real risk – and achieves so little. Lastly, I would appreciate your thoughts on my previous question – why do eminent groups such as Save the Children, National Children’s Youth Law Center, The Australian Library & Information Association and Civil Liberties Australia all oppose mandatory internet censorship?

    Melinda Tankard Reist

    [There was no further reply].

    ————–

    May God forgive her for her selfish artifice.

    Like

  21. Colin Mackay January 19, 2012 at 6:24 am #

    Frankly I think this is just NAR policy to prevent network mapping of their organisation. It would be damaging if the true extent of their influence were disclosed.

    Like

  22. Ann O'Dyne January 19, 2012 at 10:07 pm #

    Hi JW – at this link there is some interesting stuff about a big London law firm threatening a 17-y-o blogger.

    worth the clickthrough to read Antony Cox’s turn-of-phrase
    eg “response to recent criticisms is to wildly thresh about in the internet, like a napalmed octopus with multiple Blackberries. “

    Like

  23. Wil January 26, 2012 at 5:27 pm #

    well, when I was harping on about freedom of speech amongst strong progressive voices everyone thought i was a bat shit crazy for thinking the laws used against Andrew Bolt were bad. Wether you think hes a fuckwit or not these same laws can shut down our own voices and used against us so as a matter of principle where the sweet fuck was everyone when Bolt was taken to court, can’t you see that you’ll eventually die by the same sword and however has the most money wont fear the courts.

    DEFEND FREE SPEECH

    Like

  24. Ann ODyne January 31, 2012 at 8:02 am #

    Who would Jesus sue? Well he would not sue Living National Treasures Clarke and Dawe, that’s for sure, because Jesus had a sense of humour, eg “forgive them, they know not what they do”.

    A Perth schoolteacher with a BA, Theology, does not understand satire it seems.
    Those of us with an understanding of The Meeja, think he needs to gird his loins for the week now coming at him like a train –
    Sueing Clarke and Dawe for Godssakes.

    Satire? one would think a teacher would recognise it.

    Like

    • Gruffbutt January 31, 2012 at 1:00 pm #

      The hypocrisy lampooned in the video just multiplied.

      How dare they suggest that Christians can be callous?

      Let’s not try doing something useful like suing the Department of Immigration.

      Like

  25. paul walter January 31, 2012 at 11:30 am #

    A Perth Teacher with a theology degree, on the suffering inflicted on very small mice, who then need counselling..
    I can imagine the pity he would have felt for the razor wire at Woomera after Ali Mazar inflicted that savage assault on the poor stuff.
    He looks like a good candidate for the next series of “Send Them Back Where They Belong”, the satanist git!

    Like

  26. ywgwmuge November 28, 2013 at 3:25 pm #

    リブー目凝視は、注視新ピンポンLengranを維持し、興奮して生まれる殺人をカバー: “ガバナンス、氏チョン、何を行うには、人を、あなた冀州その点西洋亮騎兵で騎兵の前ではなく、価値がある言及は、ガード周囲も、これは小さなよくやっているなら、素直に行く冀州漢鳳に戻って、かなり良いてきたあなたましょう。 “[url=http://emerge2012.net/uggs/index.php?2458.html]シューズ ファッション,ugg tasmina,オーストラリア ugg 3161[/url] 大体ガレノス今まで二度目を使用していないように、冷却しているようだ、すべてでカンニングが、血液のトリオ、それがどのように本当にガレノスは、無知欺いていたことができない推測
    魯迅ゆうではなく、戦争のそれらの捕虜の処分は当然新ピンの手を手渡した。が、それはそのような仕事を処理するのは初めてですが、すぐに新Pingまたは物事を処理します。自然一時トレンチに組み込ま、徐黄上の顔を見、降伏する不本意それらを困らなかった降伏を希望する、すべての通行それらを手放すを支払った。[url=http://www.wrgbrand.com/ugg/index.php?3902.html]ugg 見分け方,ugg ブーツ レディース,ugg emu eagles[/url]”時間が来て、老人はどちらかの前にゾンビの王になっていませんでした、これらの灰色の目のゾンビのバインディングはそれほど大きくない。血が自然にあなたと一緒に行く味に頼​​ま!”クリアで無情、小型武器をJiushuカット、クラッシュして血流を強制的に、痛みが晴れほとんど泣きけがはなかった、来た![url=http://www.verbamate.com/ugg/index.php?286.html]アグ 正規品 通販,ugg クラッシックショート,ミニブーツ[/url]”私はそう願っています!”漢鳳この満足うなずき、我々は移動カイヤン喬のように見えることを見ることができないにもかかわらず。しかし、彼は心が知ることを望む戻って窒息し、新Pingのための賞賛の完全な笑顔は言った: “理解できる人は確かに非常にメイプル賞賛ので、徹底していたミスターチンは決して研究が、しかしのために!”
    “私はあなたを愛して!私は私の最愛の死者を見ることができない昭夫、ごめんなさい、あなたも生きている!私は子供の名付け親になりたい、私はああ、忘れないでください!”[url=http://www.wrgbrand.com/ugg/index.php?909.html]ugg ハワイ jal サーチャージ,ugg classic mini xp,ブーツ ugg sale[/url]私は紫の桜のヤオは彼のパートナーをつかんで見た最後の時間を見て、イカルス、刻まれた恐喝とイカルスの連絡先、さくらの体は血痕がいっぱいですが、全体の人々は不明昏睡状態にされている、イカを見つけるコンピュータウイルスのようなロスが遅い体の動き、。[url=http://eseed.net/uggs/index.php?2503.html]ugg japan flag,オーストラリア ugg 70% off,ugg pueblo[/url]、唯一のドン·ホー、3体液が徐々に辞任されて見ること “に場所を洗った後、眠りに落ちるようにそれらを取る、お手数、イカルス、非常に迅速に” “はい、マスター。 。 ” “ワウ、体が良好となると強度、良好なああジャンプ。” “まあ、速度、魔法の反応は多くのことを強化しました。” “兄?” “マスター、剣術であなたを待っている場所は、それを洗って行く””ああ、はい、誰が今死んで、ぬるぬる悲しいですか?
     突然の路上で殺害された兵士の[url=http://www.brookwood.com/miumiu/index.php?3242.html]miumiu 長財布 新品,miu miu usa 829,miumiu 手帳 中古[/url]生存要塞![url=http://emerge2012.net/uggs/index.php?1838.html]オーストラリア ugg 7 wide,ムートンブーツ ネイビー,ugg emu 60hsc[/url]唐ハオは、それがまたないように、まだ唐ハオ体を見ている場合、彼らはドン·ホーブレスを見つけたすべてが完全に姿を消し、あなたの目を少し閉じフランス轟音の前にドン·ホーは、モンスター感情唐ハオは、彼の人々への唯一の脅威、ブラックSEブレススプレー、唐ハオは気にしない、であると考えている “スペースの洞窟。”唐でブラックSEブレス彼らはこのモンスタートリック痛みを食べることです食べても、モンスターの背中を襲撃するホ光景、血のように赤い目ストレート唐ハオ唐ハオ右手に向かって保管さらにブラッディロアSEは、死んだモンスターを食いしばっ死が移動することができ、所定の位置に固定され、壊れた星ドン·ホー、常に凝集光の手は、 “人々は今、ああを再生、おなかおなかを行います。”
    第七十九章亡命[url=http://emerge2012.net/uggs/index.php?492.html]アグ ブーツ クリーニング,ugg ハワイ いくら,アグ オーストラリア[/url]徐黄リブーに直面して、呉カイの一つであるわずかななしだけでなく、このような権威あるレジーは、尻込みしたが、次第に彼の心の戦争を呼んだ。激しい攻撃に直面してリブー機微、彼がいないだけで圧倒されますが、斧とスタート交流リブーを振る恐れずにいませんでした。[url=http://www.faafiye.com/l/index.php?2247.html]ルイヴィトン ストール モノグラム,louis vuitton 偽物 見分け方,時計 ルイヴィトン[/url]は “新しい、ここ、ここ、急いで、あなたは知っていますか?エルシド最初のガイドたちの練習を。”聖なる戦士候補唐ハオは非常に興奮して、 “エルシ​​ドを取った?誰?ゴールド聖なる戦士は何? “驚いた聖なる戦士代替ルック”エルシドが、山羊座ゴールドセイントは、強力な剣の聖人をしています!あなたも知らないのか? “”非常に強力! “ドン·ホーも少し驚いていますが、メモリ単に “次??”来ないだろうあなたのターンはまもなく。 “”ああ、聖なる戦士候補ドン·ホー。十分に今日のために、あなたは最後の一つだね、すべて行く “のエルシド目はSE異なるフラッシュ”。 “”はい、エルシド大人。さあ “人聖者候補が絶えず分散します。” “ボクシング​​への暴力的なギャングバング、唐ハオは、目感の完全なあなたの目を閉じ、顔SEいくつかの奇妙な、未知のこの聖はいつも気持ちを私にそれを与えた理由は?保険、保険はエスケープ”、はいその後、戻ってくる。 “ボクシング​​のギャングは、徐々に大規模で、建チーをもたらす床を縦横に交差し、唐ハオ負けじと、エルシド爆撃機に向かってパンチとパンチが行く、多くの戦争が、記憶が徐々に覚えていなかった理由唐ハオ越不思議、何がこのように上に行くことはできません、彼は徐々にです。ばかりこのスタントを覚えて抑えることが、傷つくエルシド、頭倒す必要があり、 “ああくそ、ああ!燃やす!私の小さな宇宙を!スター粉塵回転力を!”ドン·ホーの記憶でもある”剣!”強い金がSE建Qiは瞬時にパン粉をリッピング。
    、私はあなたが既に、これは軍の侯の男、彼はウェイド “の古代悪”のよく知られているものであることを推測していると信じている。[url=http://ozevinmobilya.com/products/index.php?3552.html]財布 miu miu noir sunglasses,miumiu アウトレット 楽天,ミュウミュウ 5m1109[/url]はまさにこの時、声が急に明確な心を鳴らし!

    Like

  27. Where To Buy Snoop Dogg G Pen July 4, 2014 at 2:53 am #

    I have been exploring for a little for any high quality articles
    or weblog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled
    upon this website. Studying this info So i’m glad to exhibit that I’ve a very good uncanny feeling
    I discovered exactly what I needed. I so much indisputably will make sure to don?t disregard this website and give it a look on a
    constant basis.

    Like

  28. sexercise for men July 5, 2014 at 11:20 am #

    I was excited to find this web site. I need to to thank you for yojr time just for this wonderful read!!

    I definitely liked every part of iit and i also have yoou saved
    too fav to lookk at new information on your website.

    Like

  29. インデックス August 5, 2014 at 7:34 am #

    市場は狭いし権限も小さいし情報量は少ないし……東京一極集中って、
    キムタク妹役の演技では十分笑わせて貰ったからコメディアンになれば?
    この神国日本と皇室の弥栄を祈念するためには純情な処女の歌とダンスが必要なんだ

    Like

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. On Melinda Tankard Reist, the Streisand Effect and icky religious beliefs | | Furious PurposeFurious Purpose - January 16, 2012

    […] censor and silence Wilson, her past and present views and utterings are now the subject of a very public autopsy. For example, it is alleged that she deleted references to her being a Baptist and where […]

    Like

  2. On Religion and Feminism - February 22, 2012

    […] this in the recent shit fight over anti-porn/anti-abortion activist Melinda Tankard Reist, who is suing a blogger for suggesting she was deceptive about her religious motivations. Reist maintains she is a feminist […]

    Like

  3. Melinda Tankard Reist | Sex, Drugs & Politics - February 26, 2012

    […] https://noplaceforsheep.com/2012/01/15/who-would-jesus-sue/ [2] […]

    Like

  4. How The Conclave of Creepy Old Men could erode women’s reproductive rights | No Place For Sheep - March 1, 2013

    […] Harradine, as readers of this blog will remember, employed as his ethics advisor anti-abortion campaigner, all-round morals defender & “don’t call me a Baptist or I’ll sue you” celebrity Melinda Tankard Reist, during the period when he managed to deny women at home and abroad access to reproductive information, and the drug RU486. You can refresh your memory if you’d like to at my post, “Who would Jesus Sue?” […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: