London’s burning: Blame it on the BlackBerry

9 Aug

We live in a global culture in which the ability to consume is the primary measure of human freedom. To be a prosperous consumer is to be free. Given this reality, violence, theft, and rioting by disaffected youths stealing trainers and plasma TVs, while shocking, should not come entirely as a surprise.

The marauding gangs have been described as criminal opportunists, a description that can be as accurately applied to the News of the World phone hackers,  the Wall Street financiers who gave us the first global financial crisis, the private companies making exorbitant profits from the misery of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the sub-prime mortgage mongerers, authorities entrusted with public well-being who take bribes to work against the common good. Countries such as Australia, the UK and the US have been governed by men who are widely considered to be war criminals: make up your own list, the possibilities are endless.

We commit our crimes in accordance with our means and circumstances. The better our means and circumstances, the less likely we are to engage in the crimes of looting and arson. The London riots are complex in their genesis but without doubt unemployment, poverty and lack of hope play their part.

Of all the reports and analyses I’ve read thus far the one that grabbed my attention was the blame it on the BlackBerry explanation. BlackBerry offers its customers a private messenger service (BBM) that encrypts your messages, unlike the other social media that are available to everyone, including the authorities. It seems that many rioters are communicating via their BlackBerries, and when this is the case, police cannot find out until it’s too late where the next outbreak of violence will be. This has allegedly led to the rapid expansion of trouble spots around the country, as agitators’ communications cannot be decoded by authorities in time to prevent new outbreaks.

It seems something of a long bow. Presumably  an intercity tweet can also get things going faster than police can organize officers on the ground. The real objection to BBM is that it thwarts official surveillance, and when disaffected youth have a means of communication that excludes any possibility of the authorities cracking their codes, this is perceived as a menace in principle, if not in practice.

The mobile phone is one of the iconic symbols of consumption. BlackBerrys cost less than smartphones and BBM is both essentially cost-free and invisible to police. In order to communicate, BBM users must exchange PINs, but their conversations are private. They can spread their PINs via SMS, Twitter or other means.

There’s little doubt that the use of social media is a vital force in getting uprisings of all kinds off the ground, and its use enables rapid expansion. But to blame the London riots on the BlackBerry is like blaming the Arab Spring on Facebook. Social media is a tool available to everyone to use how they see fit. Undoubtedly there’ll be a call to ban BBM before too much longer, or distribute the facility only to those authorities deem to be worthy of their trust.

The violence and looting is awful. But blanket condemnation of the guilty is too simplistic. Yes, they have to be held accountable. Yes, they have to face the consequences of their actions. But these events don’t happen in a vacuum. Criminal behaviour is not peculiar to disaffected youth. Stealing trainers and plasma TVs is no more or less criminal and deserving of punishment than hacking phones, exploiting dead children, starting illegal wars and ruining the global economy. We don’t call for a law and order crackdown except when the crimes are perpetrated by disaffected youth. It’s a class-based demand.

Western culture worships consumerism. We measure worth by what we have and what we can afford. Everywhere we look there’s corruption and criminal behaviour. It’s the zeitgeist. Commentators have been quick to point out that these riots are not political uprisings because one of the goals is to steal stuff.  They’re wrong. These riots are absolutely political. The ultimate assessment of human worth in Western culture is what the human owns and is capable of owning. The middle class aspire to wealth. The working class aspires to what the middle class has. When a large enough group feels it has no stake in society, that group will revolt. Trainers and plasma TVs are the pathetic symbols of the revolt of the have nots against the haves. Not political? You must be dreamin.’

6 Responses to “London’s burning: Blame it on the BlackBerry”

  1. Dejan Tesic August 9, 2011 at 7:40 pm #

    Mob psychology shouldn’t be underestimated, though.


  2. gerard oosterman August 9, 2011 at 10:19 pm #

    Also don’t underestimate the sheer ugliness of so much that is man-made in UK (and here). I am always surprised how ‘giving form’ to our visual surroundings is so terribly neglected.
    Most of us have eyes and are very much influenced by what we see. I know that ugliness is not just only owned by the Anglo’s but frankly their hotch potch of public architecture is pretty dismal.
    How can any young person survive such visual rape of surroundings?


    • Jennifer Wilson August 10, 2011 at 8:36 am #

      Yes, some buildings are pretty desolate, especially housing estates. I agree Gerard, the environment has a big effect on a human being, and if it’s bad we close down and dull ourselves. It makes people shrink instead of grow.

      I don’t think Cameron’s tough talk is going to achieve anything, in fact will make things worse. Politicians never seem to learn that tough talk might make them feel powerful, but it incites it’s target to even more rebellion and violence. Pity about his summer hols in the Tuscon villa!!!!!


    • Steve at the Pub August 12, 2011 at 7:54 pm #

      Glasgow hasn’t kicked off yet. (If glum surroundings/architecture is reason to riot)
      Neither was there much of it on the other side of the Iron Curtain. Having been there, I know that architecture behind the iron curtain was much more of a “visual rape” than London.

      But then, if anyone had rioted in commo countries, there’d have been a most robust response, (real cannon, not water cannon, & real bullets, not baton rounds)


  3. paul walter August 10, 2011 at 2:42 pm #

    “Goodbye, Blackberry Way,
    I can’t see you,
    I can’t reach you..” – Old rock song from 60’group Wizard.
    No, blaming it on on the blackberries is a bridge too far, the problems in these places are caused by politicians like Cameron and his City of London supporters and others imbued with neolib economics since the time of Thatcher. In fact, race riots have been a fixture of life in Britain since the late fifties of last century and generally go hand in hand with neglect of blue collar suburbs where they have to all battle for a piece of a diminishing pie, while the wealthy retire to Midsomer/Elvedon, for a weather change.



  1. London’s burning: Blame it on the BlackBerry | PDA8 - August 10, 2011

    […] We live in a global culture in which the ability to consume is the primary measure of human freedom.Go to Source […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: