Abbott says Gillard “too precious” about “bitch” word

25 Mar

by Stephen Rowler via flickr

 

Not content with standing under a banner proclaiming that Julia Gillard is “Bob Brown’s Bitch,” Opposition Leader Tony Abbot (aka the Nope Dope ®!!) said on the 7.30 Report last night that Prime Minister Julia Gillard is getting a bit “too precious” about the signs.

I’m not easily offended – I have to stop myself from scrawling the F word on signs in public parks in Nevada that say “No profanities. Have a nice day.” But I don’t like the signs I saw at yesterday’s Tea Party moment in front of Parliament House.

As others have pointed out, we’ve seen more violent rallies in the past. Then there was that spectacular papier-mâché John Howard as a little dog with its nose up George Bush’s fundament.

I thought that was pretty funny.

But calling a female PM some bloke’s bitch has really got up my nose, and I don’t even care that much for the PM. It’s nothing to do with the dignity of office either, that disappeared as a consideration a long time ago.

The bitch sign is actually no more offensive than portraying Howard as an arse licker, except that’s not a gender specific insult, whereas bitch most certainly is.

If you call a bloke a c**t  that’s a bigger insult than calling him a prick. Some feminists regularly try to insult me by telling me I’ve got a prick in my head, and I should get back in my “man fondling box”, and strangely, I’m not offended by either of those observations. If a woman called me a “c**t I wouldn’t bat an eyelash, but if a man used the same expletive in anger, I’d be a little troubled and keep my distance.

Then there’s those wonderful subversives who reclaim bad words and turn them right back at you. I love to see forbidden language exposed for what it is – words with cultural baggage.

It all comes down to intent – what forces fuel the use of the expletives? Loathing, rage, fear? Affection, humour, joshing? It’s the emotions that give language life  and meaning.

The difference for me between the Gillard bitch placards, and Howard as a bad mannered dog is humour. There was nothing humorous about the bitch placards. They were a little bit scary because of that. Their rage-filled message was unmediated by invitations to laughter.

Though there are groups in which the word is entirely lacking in offense who would have found it funny.

I didn’t like it, but I have to concede that’s an entirely personal preference and I can’t make a moral judgement on whether or not Gillard is “too precious” and Abbott is “sexist” in positioning himself in a manner that endorses the sentiments of the sign. I suspect he wanted to insult the PM, he usually does. And she usually wants to insult him.

We live in a culture of insult, daily faced with the onerous task of decoding the language used by us and around us, making instant judgements abut whether or not the words were intended to offend, and whether or not we’ll agree to be offended.

But what I do intensely dislike, no matter where it comes from, is the distorted, screaming fury (or fake fury that’s even worse) that sets the tone in Parliament and increasingly outside the chamber. It doesn’t matter what they say when they’ve turned themselves into the raging furies, frothing and spitting from faces reddened with outrage, real or fake.

I can’t hear them anymore.
Related Articles
Advertisements

7 Responses to “Abbott says Gillard “too precious” about “bitch” word”

  1. Sam Jandwich March 25, 2011 at 10:59 am #

    The other thing that nobody seems to have pointed out is that the sign is equally a homophobic slur against Bob Brown. The term “bitch” in this context is used to describe a male sex slave in a jail – And so to call Julia Gillard “Bob Brown’s bitch”is to imply that Bob Brown as the dominant male has “recruited” Julia Gillard in her vulnerable position, and is serially raping her.

    I don’t know much about the law, but isn’t there a law against the vilification of minorities, and shouldn’t the bloke with the sign be charged? Tony Abbot’s failing to tell the sign’s owner to put it away, using it as his backdrop, and then saying it was “over the top” is a pretty clear demonstration of the kind of man he is IMO. He needs to go for the sake of the whole country.

    Like

    • Jennifer Wilson March 25, 2011 at 7:03 pm #

      Yeah, I was thinking about that this morning – I was wondering if they’d have dared use a sign like that if the PM was male, and in fact that’s the only way it really makes sense in gay terms.

      Abbott is…OMG don’t get me started. It’s Friday. I’m going for a swim.

      Like

  2. PAUL WALTER March 25, 2011 at 1:49 pm #

    Wot Sam Jandwich says, in spades.

    Like

  3. G.Hoffmann March 27, 2011 at 11:44 am #

    Spades,clubs,Abbott??
    Who’s got the balaclavas?

    ; )

    Like

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Switching Up the Roles | Alarna Rose Gray - July 5, 2013

    […] top it all off, any sign of disapproval is met with the accusation we’re just “too precious” and “playing the gender […]

    Like

  2. Fast Forward to the Fifties | Alarna Rose Gray - September 13, 2013

    […] The guy who happily stood in front of the “Ditch the Witch…Bob Brown’s Bitch” banner, and then said Julia Gillard was being “too precious”? […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: